- Posts: 51
- Thank you received: 1
Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
- P. Swemmelaar
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
3 weeks 3 days ago #173626
by P. Swemmelaar
Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2 was created by P. Swemmelaar
I installed OSSB 4.0.0 on a test subdomain with the data of a live-site (on the same server). The performance of 4.0.0 is teriible compared to 2.23.2. In the front-end as well as in the back-end it is 2 to 4 times slower.
You can see my resultas in the Word-document attached. I stopped testing after 2 testcases.
Kind regards,
Peter
You can see my resultas in the Word-document attached. I stopped testing after 2 testcases.
Kind regards,
Peter
- Dang Thuc Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13249
- Thank you received: 1729
3 weeks 3 days ago #173627
by Dang Thuc Dam
Replied by Dang Thuc Dam on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi Peter,
Thank you for reaching out to us.
To assist you further, could you please submit a ticket under the "OS Services Booking" category and provide us with an administrator account? This will allow our technical team to check and analyze the loading speed of the OS Services Booking features.
Once we receive the necessary information, we will proceed with the investigation and keep you updated on our findings.
Thanks
Dam
Thank you for reaching out to us.
To assist you further, could you please submit a ticket under the "OS Services Booking" category and provide us with an administrator account? This will allow our technical team to check and analyze the loading speed of the OS Services Booking features.
Once we receive the necessary information, we will proceed with the investigation and keep you updated on our findings.
Thanks
Dam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dol
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- JC
Less
More
- Posts: 31
- Thank you received: 1
2 weeks 5 days ago - 2 weeks 5 days ago #173659
by Dol
Replied by Dol on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi,
I can confirm the same issue on my side.
The booking page takes on average 4 to 6 seconds to load, and there are additional delays at almost every step of the reservation process. This makes the user experience noticeably slow compared to what we had before.It would be great if the development team could investigate possible performance bottlenecks in the new version, as the slowdown seems consistent and not related to server resources.
Regards,
I can confirm the same issue on my side.
The booking page takes on average 4 to 6 seconds to load, and there are additional delays at almost every step of the reservation process. This makes the user experience noticeably slow compared to what we had before.It would be great if the development team could investigate possible performance bottlenecks in the new version, as the slowdown seems consistent and not related to server resources.
Regards,
Last edit: 2 weeks 5 days ago by Dol.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dang Thuc Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13249
- Thank you received: 1729
2 weeks 5 days ago #173661
by Dang Thuc Dam
Replied by Dang Thuc Dam on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi Dol,
I am currently working with Peter on the page loading performance issue. To further investigate and test the problem, could you please submit a support ticket and provide the following information:
- Your website URL
- An administrator account
This will help me gather more data for testing and work towards a solution.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Dam
I am currently working with Peter on the page loading performance issue. To further investigate and test the problem, could you please submit a support ticket and provide the following information:
- Your website URL
- An administrator account
This will help me gather more data for testing and work towards a solution.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Dam
The following user(s) said Thank You: P. Swemmelaar
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dol
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- JC
Less
More
- Posts: 31
- Thank you received: 1
2 weeks 5 days ago #173662
by Dol
Replied by Dol on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi Dam,
Thank you for your reply.
I will open a support ticket and provide the requested information (URL + administrator account) so that you can investigate the loading performance issue directly on my website.
Regards,
Thank you for your reply.
I will open a support ticket and provide the requested information (URL + administrator account) so that you can investigate the loading performance issue directly on my website.
Regards,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dang Thuc Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13249
- Thank you received: 1729
2 weeks 5 days ago #173664
by Dang Thuc Dam
Replied by Dang Thuc Dam on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi,
After several days of working with Peter, we have found a solution that significantly improves the page load time.
Thank you for your patience during this process. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please let me know.
Best regards,
Dam
After several days of working with Peter, we have found a solution that significantly improves the page load time.
Thank you for your patience during this process. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please let me know.
Best regards,
Dam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- P. Swemmelaar
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 51
- Thank you received: 1
2 weeks 4 days ago #173673
by P. Swemmelaar
Replied by P. Swemmelaar on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi Dam,
When can we download the buggix?
Kind regards,
Peter
When can we download the buggix?
Kind regards,
Peter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dang Thuc Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13249
- Thank you received: 1729
2 weeks 4 days ago #173674
by Dang Thuc Dam
Replied by Dang Thuc Dam on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Hi Peter,
We would like to inform you that we will release a new version of OS Services Booking including all recent bug fixes as soon as possible.
Thanks
Dam
We would like to inform you that we will release a new version of OS Services Booking including all recent bug fixes as soon as possible.
Thanks
Dam
The following user(s) said Thank You: P. Swemmelaar
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Johnny Rex
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
1 week 1 day ago - 1 week 1 day ago #173832
by Johnny Rex
Replied by Johnny Rex on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Support ticket created.
Last edit: 1 week 1 day ago by Johnny Rex. Reason: updated info
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dang Thuc Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13249
- Thank you received: 1729
1 week 1 day ago #173844
by Dang Thuc Dam
Replied by Dang Thuc Dam on topic Very bad performance 4.0.0 compared to 2.23.2
Replied
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Dang Thuc Dam
Support
Documentation
Information
Copyright © 2025 Joomla Extensions by Joomdonation. All Rights Reserved.
joomdonation.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Joomla! Project or Open Source Matters.
The Joomla! name and logo is used under a limited license granted by Open Source Matters the trademark holder in the United States and other countries.
The Joomla! name and logo is used under a limited license granted by Open Source Matters the trademark holder in the United States and other countries.