- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 1
Mannage orders.
- Kai Hansen
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Mr. Dam
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Kai Hansen
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
10 years 11 months ago - 10 years 11 months ago #45743
by Kai Hansen
Replied by Kai Hansen on topic Mannage orders.
What I think on is this
1. xxxxxxxx [16.06.2014 15:00 - 16.06.2014 15:45] Employee: xxx xxx
2. xxxxxxxx [16.06.2014 16:00 - 16.06.2014 16:45] Employee: xxx xxx
not as it is now
1. xxxxxxx [16.06.2014 16:00 - 16.06.2014 16:45] Employee: xxx xxx
2. xxxxxxx [16.06.2014 15:00 - 16.06.2014 15:45] Employee: xxx xxx
First time - at top...
probably not really a sorting, maybe just a slight change in the script
No big deal - just a thought
1. xxxxxxxx [16.06.2014 15:00 - 16.06.2014 15:45] Employee: xxx xxx
2. xxxxxxxx [16.06.2014 16:00 - 16.06.2014 16:45] Employee: xxx xxx
not as it is now
1. xxxxxxx [16.06.2014 16:00 - 16.06.2014 16:45] Employee: xxx xxx
2. xxxxxxx [16.06.2014 15:00 - 16.06.2014 15:45] Employee: xxx xxx
First time - at top...
probably not really a sorting, maybe just a slight change in the script
No big deal - just a thought
Last edit: 10 years 11 months ago by Kai Hansen.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Mr. Dam